How far we’ve come or “Welcome Back McCarthy”

A little background information:  John McCain on CodePink

First a little background information (for those of you who passed 5th grade civics class I apologize for the review; it’s more for our illustrious representatives):  The opening to the founding document and the highest law in the land begins with “We the People,” includes numerations of rights assured to the people (including Freedom of Speech and Expression), and has been interpreted by one of our greatest Presidents as meaning a nation, “for the People, by the People, and of the People.”  Even our Declaration of Independence describes the fundamental principles on which liberty is founded and includes, in part, a description of legitimate government as being, “Government by consent of the governed,” and assures us of the right to alter or abolish any unjust government that has become so oppressive as to be tyrannical in nature and practice.  Above all though, these documents make it clear that the entire purpose of the legislature (state and/or federal) is to listen to the constituency and act according to what the people want (while protecting the minority from abuse).

Now the current way things work:  The legislature is elected by infusing commercials with misinformation and relying on the comparatively tiny amount of voters that participate.  Once in office, the majority of them rely on “Campaign Contributions” from special interest groups while conveniently ignoring the pleas of their people (or at least the ones without money).

All of this leads me to the group CodePink, a women’s anti-war group that frequents congressional hearings (their right as citizens) and are routinely thrown out for “disruptions” no different than Republican disruptions in a Democratic congress and vice versa.  A good deal of them are Mr. McCain’s constituents, yet because of their unpopular opinion, he calls them scum.  Sen. Feinstein (D) threw them out of a CIA confirmation hearing because of less than audible disruptions: Audio of Hearing and no Congress or Executive has given credence to this large movement (a very poignant fallback to the difficulties of the Suffragettes).

If the problem is not evident by now, let me spell it out.  While I may agree with CodePink and what they are trying to do, that point is irrelevant.  I disagree with Westboro Baptist Church, the KKK, and many other bigoted groups, but they still have the right to express their opinions (so long as they do not interfere with others self-same rights) and should be heard in the context of their overall populace representation.  That is what Freedom of Speech means!  I may not like what you say (or I may support it on different levels) but everyone has the right to be heard.  Government employees at every level are duty bound to hear and give credence to their citizenry.   If they feel it is interrupting their important “business” (you know, bilking the public and so forth), their responsibility would be to offer truly public hearings that would allow those voters to express themselves and give the legislature (Executives and Justices as well) the full picture, regardless of personal opinions.

So let CodePink speak, at the very least, with equal opportunity as the wealthy special interest groups.  Their message is sound and agreed with by 66% of American (27% Approve): American Current War Support. And their message is not in least bit unsound:  CodePink.  Yet the opinions of the citizens (unless they pander and flatter to those with money and/or power) are ignored even though Congress works far less than anyone in any country (not counting their “vacation” which come out of your taxes).  To verify, follow this link (the blue days are work days and Congress is paid even when they don’t work):  Congress work days and what they spent their time on (bear in mind some activities overlap and were done at the same Time:  Congressional Breakdown.  This is the President’s priorities (golf is more important than poverty apparently): Presidential time.  Finally, the Supreme Court works 5 hours per day(End of October to beginning of June, excluding  federal holidays, can choose which cases to accept, recesses frequently and takes an enormous amount of time to be even heard and thus works a maximum of 143 days or 715 total hours:  Work days Supreme Court Calculator.  The point being that no elected official works enough to even logically say they can’t listen to their constituency.

CodePink deserves to be heard and McCain’s comments are indicative of how Congress feels and by extension how the government feels about our populace.  They are so disconnected sitting in their golden mansions an deaf ears that they use the guise of democracy (which we have none nor are we headed towards it again) and placate the people with plenty of gadgets, games, and make sure no one notices the clear violations of the social contract (for example, several wars that are killing our young people in droves but few efforts are being made to change things because as long as we have “Candy Crush” we can ignore our attempt to occupy the world and keep our populace ignorant by reducing education, science, etc.).  If we were to educate our young and old people we might understand CodePink, and at least have rational debates on the many viewpoints out there.

I fear, however, that we have past this point.  The income divide is too great and the people too indolent to make the changes necessary.  I encourage CodePink and any of those who share the beliefs of a free, peaceful, and united nation to join together in arms to set up and defend a nation founded and sealed on truth, justice, liberty, equality, and brotherhood (sisterhood, etc.). We have been oppressed and insulted by the wealthy rulers long enough,  We must join together and exercise our right to revolt: Declaration of Independence.  If a new and better nation that listens and addresses your complaints, concerns, ideas, etc. sounds like a place you would want to be a part of, feel free to contact me.  If you believe we can save this current United States, please contact me for a rational discourse.  I am always looking for new ways of looking at things.

Foundational Documents:

John Locke

Federalist Papers

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Thomas Hobbes

US Constitution

SCOTUS Oaths of Office

All Other Oaths of Office

Voter Turnout 2014

Historic VEP

 

I don’t Belieber you

Usually I wouldn’t comment on something so trivial but Justin Bieber is a thorn in my side. It is ridiculous enough that his only discernable talent is his singing ability (helped, of course, by Autotune and a host of digital “enhancements”) and we hold him up on a pedestal because of that, but his recent skirmish with the law and the rather staged look of it tipped me over the edge. It is no secret that he is a puppet of his even less talented handler Usher, and this recent chain of events only seems to reinforce this. His mugshot sports him with hair that is only slightly miffed (look through your local newspaper and find anyone who has had time to do their hair prior to being arrested), a visible base coat of foundation (unless his face is just naturally a different shade than the rest of his body), mascara (yes, mascara because very few boys his age that I have seen have long, full eyelashes like a L’Oreal commercial), and a smirk that shows how confident he is of his limited engagement in the county jail, despite the fact that most DUI recipients are at least held in the drunk tank until they can sober up.

My theory, and it is by no means any more than that is this: Usher knew that “bad boys” are popular with the teenage crowd he panders to, but he also knew that Bieber couldn’t have the rap sheet of say Eminem and still be allowed by these teenagers’ parents in their home. He knew however, that a DUI while a serious offense is not viewed by most people as being as serious as drug possession or assault and is a more forgiveable crime in younger people so long as no one gets hurt. He concocted this plan to give Bieber some “street cred” as it were and gave Bieber enough alcohol to blow the required 0.08, then set him behind the wheel, assured him of his bailing, and tipped the police off that Bieber was driving drunk knowing they couldn’t resist such a prized catch. All of this done, of course, after ensuring that Bieber looked just “rough” enough to pass as intoxicated, but still decent enough not to look like a hard criminal.

This, of course, is both Usher and Bieber’s prerogative but what really infuriates me is that MADD (Mother’s Against Drunk Driving) can spend hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of dollars making the police look like the NSA (the commercial where they are camouflaged as people who are obviously drunk walk by and then end with the slogan of “We’ll see you before you see us” is as creepy as the thought that our own government feels no need to operate within the confines of the law in surveillance) have made not even so much as a condemnation of this immensely popular figure’s mocking the very serious and dangerous crime of operating a machine that can and has killed many people, under the influence of a substance that removes inhibitions and impairs judgment even in small doses. No government agency or even the Governor of the state he was caught in (our “great” state of Florida which has a high DUI rate compared nationwide) has come forward to say this is not acceptable behavior nor behavior to smile in a mugshot for as though it were a photoshoot. No agency or person that has in the past condemned drunk driving in general has even mentioned how disgusting it is that this very public figure is, in effect, encouraging his fans to embrace him BECAUSE of a dangerous and deadly crime and is by association, encouraging the committing of said crime.

So in short, whatever you believe about Bieber and his “music”, you can not believe that his actions (due to his status) were even remotely responsible or that he should have received the light treatment he did by the judge hearing his case. At the risk of contempt, one might even question how much justice this judge meted out and how much of it went back in his pocket and toward his campaign to continue in his office (in Florida we elect whether or not to allow our judges to continue in their position and election time for that is fast approaching) for surely if he had considered the repercussions of such a light treatment as allowing a drunk teen idol to not remain in jail until trial but releasing him before the alcohol had time to leave his system, he would have held him to the fullest extent of the law.

This is simply my opinion however, what do you think? Did Usher and Bieber fake this for publicity? Is Bieber’s mugshot appropriate for someone who claims to care about his fans (could have hit one of them while driving drunk) and various other social causes? Have the authorities, leaders, judge, and MADD reacted appropriately? And finally, was justice served in this case? I look forward to your response.

justin-bieber-mugshot